CPD: supporting transgender people in work

first_img Paul Milnes 2 Apr 2021 at 6:55 am # CPD: supporting transgender people in workOn 1 Apr 2021 in Sexual harassment, Gender, Continuing professional development, Gender reassignment discrimination, LGBT, Sexual orientation discrimination, OH service delivery, Research, Occupational Health, Personnel Today, Sexual orientation, Human rights Previous Article Next Article Reply Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.Comment Name (required) Email (will not be published) (required) Website Can you highlight what you have changed in the article, please, so readers can better understand what was wrong? I am curious why the word ‘transsexual’ started to be used in this section – ‘Pointers when supporting transgender individuals at work’. It would have been useful to explain whether the words mean the same , explain why a different word was used and the meaning of the two words if they are different. Thank you for the comments regarding this article. Editors are currently reviewing the issues raised and hope to amend it soon. There are many errors in this article. The protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010 are misquoted early on: gender identity is not a PC. The term ‘assigned at birth’ is a nonsense; birth sex is observed and recorded. Reply Rob Moss 8 Apr 2021 at 10:03 am # CPD: Transition period – supporting employees through gender transitioningThe process of gender transitioning is complex and not undertaken lightly. As Dawn Wyvern explains in the first of a… Reply Alan Henness 6 Apr 2021 at 2:58 pm # Diversity & Inclusion: Sign up to our free e-newsletter nowPersonnel Today’s fastest growing email newsletter focuses on all aspects of diversity and inclusion.Subscribe below to receive the latest… You said:“Transgender people are protected by two key pieces of UK legislation:The Equality Act 2010 which outlaws discrimination in both the workplace and in the wider environment on the grounds of gender identity (Gov UK, 2010).”This is incorrect. There is no protected characteristic of ‘gender identity’: the protected characteristic is ‘gender reassignment’ and that has a specific meaning given in the Act.It is also entirely separate from any provisions under the Gender Recognition Act 2004.You said:“The process of gender changeTransitioning commences with an initial appointment with the person’s general practitioner, followed by referral to a gender identity clinic (GIC). The next step is surgery and recovery before emerging into the preferred gender.”This is incorrect. No treatment, medication or surgery is required by anyone seeking a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) never mind just for any ‘social transition’. An individual may make whatever changes or adjustments she or he likes, whether that is stereotypical presentation, name change, etc and that can take as long or as short a time as that person wishes. Or they may make no changes whatsoever.Overall, the article would have benefited from a clear understanding and delineation between the two distinct categories: those who have not obtained a GRC and those who have. The former could be covered by the Equality Act protected characteristic of gender reassignment and the latter have some protection under the protected characteristic of sex. Those with a GRC can be considered for limited – but not all – purposes to be of the other sex.Employers need to be aware of, and properly understand, these different categories so they can apply the appropriate laws correctly and so that all employees are properly protected from unlawful discrimination. As ever, care must be taken to ensure that policy created to cover one situation does not inadvertently impinge on the rights of others with different protected characteristics and possibly unlawfully discriminate against them. Alan Henness 2 Apr 2021 at 1:58 am # CPD: Team effort: the multidisciplinary management of referrals within occupational healthThe benefits of multidisciplinary working within occupational health are increasingly well-recognised. Janet O’Neill argues that the better your understanding of… In the second article in her two-part series, Dawn Wyvern looks at practical ways employers, with the help of occupational health, can support transgender people in the workplace.This is the second of two articles (with the first one published in January) considering issues relating to transgender issues in the workplace.The transgender community face a range of challenges relating to both their private and work life. The first article covered issues relating to the process of transition. This article explores legal requirements and considers how an organisation can best support an employee during and after their transition to their preferred gender.About the authorDawn Wyvern is an occupational health nurse advisor and offshore medicOccupational health advisers (OHAs) may be involved in supporting transgender staff, particularly during the period that they are receiving psychological, medical and surgical treatment. If the OHA is to give the appropriate advice to both the employer and managers a knowledge of the legal requirements associated with transgender issues is essential.Legal requirementsTransgender people are protected by two key pieces of UK legislation:The Equality Act 2010 which outlaws discrimination in both the workplace and in the wider environment on the grounds of gender reassignment (even though gender identity is not in itself a protected characteristic) (Gov UK, 2010).The Gender Recognition Act 2004 allows transgender people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate to legally change their gender (Gov UK, 2004).Employers must support transgender employees and they should not discriminate against them because of their transgender identity.The work undertaken to bring this legislation into place was driven by the transgender activist group ‘Press For Change’, with input and drive from Professor Stephen Whittle, a professor of law, and Christine Burns, a political activist and health adviser.Press for Change lobbied and advised the British and European governments on key diversity issues relating to transgender and human rights, with the development of the Gender Recognition Act 2004, and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, which has been superseded by the Equality Act 2010 (Press for Change, 2012).There are clear requirements under this legislation to maintain confidentiality and ensure data protection with regards to employees’ trans status. This, and their transition history must not be disclosed without their express permission. Their transgender status should only be disclosed with their permission and provided there is good reason to do so.“Outing” a person as transgender is classed as direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 and could result in criminal charges under the Gender Recognition Act 2004.Disclosure of the fact that an employee has obtained a gender recognition certificate is also a criminal offence subject to legal prosecution (HM Courts and Tribunals Service, 2019; Gov UK, 2004).Legal casesThere have been numerous instances where legal action in respect of discrimination has been brought by transgender workers and the court has found in their favour (Press for Change, 2012).For example, the 1992 case of ‘P’ versus ‘S’ and Cornwall County Council, is described as a landmark case in the support of transgender people in the workplace.‘P’ was a head teacher who considered herself to be female but who had been recorded as male at birth. P informed her manager of her wish to transition, and arranged to take sick leave to have the required surgical treatment.Following this surgery, her employer would not permit her to return to work in her female role and three months later she was dismissed. The case was considered by the European Court of Justice who found this to be discriminatory and unlawful (European Court of Justice, 1994).In another case, ‘A’ versus the West Yorkshire Police, ‘A’ was refused employment as they were transgender. The court, and then the court of appeal, found in ‘A’s favour paving the way for further cases for other transgender individuals, including, ‘M’ verses West Midlands Police (House of Lords, 2004; Press for Change, 2012).The process of gender changeTransitioning, for many people, commences with an initial appointment with the person’s general practitioner, followed by referral to a gender identity clinic (GIC). The next step is surgery and recovery before emerging into the preferred gender.This process takes a minimum of two-and-a-half years, but frequently exceeds four.Several steps must be negotiated throughout the process of transition including administrative processes then surgical and medical interventions.Administrative processes include legal processes to change their name by deed poll followed by other administrative changes to personal documents, such as bank accounts and passport.Health interventions include referral for psychological support. Males who are transitioning to female may require electrolysis, facial surgery speech therapy to change their voice pitch, and may undergo vocal surgery to further facilitate this. Females who are transitioning to male may often require “top surgery” to develop a more masculine profile.Furthermore, the person must also deal with family issues undertaking a “real life test” of living in the chosen gender and eventually moving to a “normal” life. It is very important to be cognisant that each transition is personal and unique (Anon 2020).Support in the workplaceManaging the support in the workplace for transgender employees should begin at recruitment and consider flexibility in terms of any requirements for the inclusion of pronouns, titles and genders on application forms.Asking for previous names should be done sensitively and only if there is a specific need to do so such as recruiting to a security sensitive role. Company policies should be robust and ensure that transgender employees are treated fairly and sensitively.Employers should make provision for high-quality diversity and inclusion training to staff at all levels. Access to an Employee Assistance Programme may prove beneficial for all employees, and transgender employees may particularly appreciate the support that such programmes provide.Every transgender person will have a different experience and it is important to address each situation individually and be as flexible as possible in providing support.One way of providing this support is to have a robust equal opportunities and specific gender identity policies, differentiated from sexuality/sexual orientation. These policies should emphasise a supportive, flexible and tailored approach.When supporting a person who is transitioning, it is important to discuss with them whether they would like any temporary changes to working arrangements, such as a period away from client-facing roles. These discussions should be led by the employee and subject to confidentiality requirements under the Equalities act 2010 (Gov UK, 2010).Data should be managed carefully and a plan made with the employee as to how their information will be updated. Non-consensual disclosure should be avoided and only previous identity documents should be retained that are strictly necessary for purposes such as pensions. Any disclosure of the individual’s history should be controlled by them and they should be reassured about how information about them is managed and confidentiality assured.There may be a need for them to take time away from work, and these absences should be treated like any other authorised absence.An important element of supporting the worker through the transition process is to assess any barriers and take steps to minimise any feelings of isolation. Some examples could be offering gender-neutral uniforms and flexibility with regards to name badges and staff photos in the early stages of the transition process.It would be prudent regularly to review policies to ensure they are fit for purpose. Of particular importance are those relating to employee dignity and inclusivity and equal opportunities. Organisational policies should make it clear that any form of bullying will not be tolerated (HR 24, 2020; Gilroy-Scott, 2018) A positive approach to transgender employees can be shown by ensuring that everyone is respectful and inclusive.Education of both co-workers and the management team is important. Transgender employees need to know they will be treated with respect and that company policies will be upheld.Reference to gender reassignment support should be incorporated within any company equality and diversity policies (TUC, 2016; Morton, 2015; Royal College of Nursing, 2020).Understanding a ‘Memorandum of understanding’When an employee is going through the process of transitioning, the organisation should be cognisant that, prior to visible transition, there are non-visible elements which take place over a period of a few months. It may be of benefit to draw up a memorandum of understanding (MU) that provides an outline of the transitioning process relating to the individual and the company.This should be a collaborative initiative drafted by the manager and the individual together, highlighting key milestones in the transition process and include a proposed time frame for actions to be undertaken, providing a guide to help management and the individual cover all the required steps (NHS England, 2019; NHS 2020).Elements incorporated within the MU are of particular importance once the visible stage of the transition has been reached. It should determine what will be communicated, by whom and when and how this will occur.There will be absences in order to attend medical, surgical and other appointments including attendance at medical and GIC clinic appointments. The requirement of attendance at such clinics should be established and included within the MU. It is essential that policies and procedures are robust and in place to support transitioning.Of particular importance are those policies covering bullying and harassment and dignity at work. Triggers for sickness absence may need to be adjusted.It is important that the manager should listen empathetically then plan, and support the member of staff as they transition. This may include asking “out of the box” questions, brain-storming, and “playing devil’s advocate” in order to find solutions to the challenges which they may face. In some situations, the individual may need a short period away from work prior to them commencing in their new gender.The MU should incorporate elements which will arise as visible elements of the transitioning process are reached. Communications with other work colleagues as the transition process progresses can be in the form of a “heads up” message with clear organisational support including management, peers, team members and other departments.A proposed timescale and timeline for visible transition should be established; this will assist as the employee attends work in the preferred gender. It should highlight the timeline for the necessary time off from work prior to transition, indicating the dates when various changes will take effect.These changes will include the person’s chosen name and pronoun, the date that uniform, and administrative changes will commence. It is important to note the timing when the use of preferred welfare facilities will commence.There should be some flexibility with regards to this likely timescale in line with changes to personal situations and circumstances and they must be aligned to the individual’s private life and various medical requirements.It is crucial to be aware that this is their transition and can be a very stressful time. Support from their employer can reduce some of the associated challenges.Pointers when supporting transgender individuals at workThe process of transitioning will be stressful for the employee and they will face a number of challenging and the OHA must be cognisant of this and remain sensitive to the feelings of the person they are supporting. It is also valuable here to be clear about the distinctions between the words ‘transgender’ and ‘transsexual’. Transgender is an umbrella term for people who identify differently from their biological sex. Someone who is transsexual has physically transitioned. These guidelines may be of assistance.Don’t ask about personal or intimate questions. This is unless this is relevant to your medical role, or if you are invited to ask, but remember to keep the information confidential.Don’t assume where someone is on their personal trans-spectrum. This is a fluid process and may change in any direction.Don’t assume anyone’s sexual orientation.Don’t speculate about anyone’s gender or physical sex.Don’t use pronouns without asking their preference.Don’t negatively comment on their appearance or how “convincing” they are.Don’t allow discrimination in any form. Discrimination is outlined within the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and includes protection for both direct and indirect discrimination. It is important to have an understanding of some terms which relate to discrimination.Direct discrimination occurs as a result of unnecessarily requiring someone not to be transsexual. Indirect discrimination occurs if transsexual people are particularly disadvantaged by an organisational policy, provision or criteria.Discrimination can occur by perception or by association. Discrimination by perception is defined as where an assumption is made that someone is transsexual, and they are discriminated against because of it, but they are not transsexual.Discrimination by association has occurred if a person is discriminated against because although they are not themselves transsexual they mix with, or have an association with, transsexual people.Harassment has occurred if a person(s) act in ways that violate the dignity of another person. This might occur if there is an environment which is intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for that person as a result of them being transsexual.It is unlawful to discriminate against someone because they have used the provisions of the legislation or have helped someone else to do so, the legal term for this is victimisation (Gov UK, 2014; HM Courts and Tribunals Service, 2019). These pointers help treat transgender people with respect although, in fact, can be applied as best practice for how you treat any employee.Do include transgender people in work-based activities.Do offer support when they need it.Do educate any co-workers or others who ridicule or use derogatory terms.Be available to listen when required.Do remember that transgender people are people with feelings and opinions.Do remember that transgender people have families.Do remember that transitioning is a dynamic process.Do remember that transgender people, just like anybody else, may have illnesses at times and not all illnesses are related to transitioning; not everything health-wise is related to transgender. (Powers, 2019; McNeil et al, 2012; Mermaids, 2020; HR-24, 2020).Toilets and changing roomsThis is an area that often arises in many workplaces and can be quite an emotional subject for all concerned. Managers must ensure that transgender employees are able to use facilities appropriate to their expressed gender identity without fear of harassment.It may be appropriate to set a date when this will happen, such as the social transition date, and ensure it is communicated to ensure colleagues are not surprised.People should not be made to use unisex disabled toilets, unless they choose to do so. This may be their preference as a temporary measure during the early stages of their transition period (House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee, 2015).ConclusionThere are both moral and legal reasons for employers to ensure that every member of their workforce is treated with respect, irrespective of their race, religion, gender or sexuality.Not only must the employer comply with legislation related to employment and diversity such as the Equality Act 2010, they also have a duty of care encompassed within the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974).In order to discharge their duties, managers or the trans person may ask for OH advice and support in relation to the process of transitioning and it is important that the OH professional remains cognisant of the impact of this process on the individual and how the manager can ensure a supportive workplace and best assist their team member through the process.References“CPD: Transition period – supporting employees through gender transitioning”, Occupational Health & Wellbeing, January 2021 (print), volume 73, no 1, available online at: CPD: Transition period – supporting employees through gender transitioning Anon (2013). “Sexual orientation, homosexuality and bisexuality”. American Psychological Association.Anon. (2020). Female to Male Transsexuals: Gender Reassignment and FTM Surgery Guide. Available online at: https://www.femaletomale.orgEuropean Court of Justice (1994). P vs S and Cornwall County Council , S.l.: European Court of Justice.Gilroy-Scott C at al (2018). “How to manage gender identity in the workplace. Available online at: https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/how-to-manage-gender-identity-in-the-workplace-transgender/Gender Recognition Act 2004. GOV UK, (2004). London: HMSO .The Equality Act 2010. GOV UK, (2010). London: HMSO.“T455 The General Guide for all Users Gender Recognition Act 2004”. HM Courts and Tribunals Service, (2019), London: HMSO.Transgender Equality First Report of Session 2015-16. House of Commons Women and Equalities Commitee (2015). London UK: House of Commons.“Judgments – A (Respondent) v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (Appellant) and another”. House of Lords, (2004). London : House of Lords .“Transgender Employees Experiences and a Guide for Employers”. HR24 (2020). Available online at: https://www.hr-24.co.uk/articles/transgender-employees/McNeil J et al (2012). “Trans Mental Helath Study”. Available online at: https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/tavistock-transgender-transition-teenage-girls-female-to-maleMermaids Transgender Support. Mermaids (2020). Available online at: https://mermaidsuk.org.uk/parents/Morton J (2015). “Gender identity, An introductory guide for trade union reps supporting trans members”. Available online at: https://www.unison.org.uk/about/what-we-do/fairness-equality/lgbt/“NHS England Gender Dysporial Clinincal Programme”. NHS England (2019). Available online at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/npc-crg/gender-dysphoria-clinical-programme/“Gender Identity Clinic”. NHS (2020). Available online at: https://gic.nhs.uk/referrals/what-happens-when-you-are-referred/Powers W (2019), https://powersfamilymedicine.com/news-eventsPress for Change (2012). Available online at: http://www.pfc.org.uk“Fair Care for Trans Patients”. Royal College of Nursing (2020). Available online at: https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/pub-005844TUC (2016). Transforming the work place – A TUC guide for trade union activists on supporting trans members. Available online at: https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Transformingtheworkplace.pdf Heather Finlay 3 Apr 2021 at 9:38 pm # Reply Related posts: Reply Reply Indeed, Paul. Those are fundamental errors that undermine the rest of the article. I hope PT will issue a correction and perhaps publish a more accurate and informative article. 6 Responses to CPD: supporting transgender people in work Alan Henness 17 Apr 2021 at 7:55 pm #last_img read more

Permission granted for University housing project

first_imgUniversity plans to build hundreds of postgraduate student flats and bed­sits on a former rail site have been approved.Planning permission was granted to the University last Wednesday, which allows 312 flats and bedsits over four and five storeys to be built at unused former railway land near the station.The new buildings will be an ex­tension to student accommodation at Castle Mill in Roger Dudman Way, which provides graduate housing for couples and families, and will include 208 study rooms, 90 one-bedroom flats, 14 two-bedroom flats, 360 cycle bays and three car parking spaces. It is phase two of a scheme that will provide a total of 436 gradu­ate student units.However, concerns over the build have been raised, particularly as Wal­ton Well Road is expected to be closed during construction, meaning ac­cess only be available through Roger Dudman. Members of the public, in a report to Oxford City’s west area planning committee, have refereed to existing access along Roger Dud­man way as “poor and dangerous” for both pedestrians and cyclists, as well as calling the project “over ambitious in scale”, and expressing worries over noise levels and working hours during construction.The Cripley Road Allotment As­sosiation, representing holders of allotments neighbouring the site, also noted potential flooding to al­lotments.But the report also acknowledged that the land was well-suited to the university’s graduate students be­cause of its good footpath and cy­cle links to the city centre, Walton Street and North Oxford.As part of the development, a new footbridge will be built to Fid­dler’s Island and paths and light­ing in Roger Dudman Way will be improved. The university has also agreed to re-fence Cripley Road Al­lotments.Tom Arnold, a Balliol DPhil stu­dent currently living in adjacent Venneit Close accommodation, said “So far, the construction hasn’t been too intrusive or disruptive. It’s a good move from the university in that it’s a good location to develop; but I do feel bad for the holders of the neighbouring allotments, as the finished building will overshadow them and construction may well af­fect them. “The really annoying thing is the closure of the cycle path to Jericho – it was a major advantage of Castle Mill which is now significantly less ‘central’.”OUSU Graduate Officer Jim O’Connell commented, “It’s great the University is building affordable quality accommodation for its grad­uate students. There will be some dis­ruption during the building process, but we are working to minimise this. However, it’s absolutely crucial the University shows it appreciates the pressures on graduate students right now as well by making sure it does not raise rents by more than inflation this year, especially after last year’s dramatic increases and the freezing of research stipends.”A spokesperson for the University of Oxford said, “The University has received planning permission to con­struct 312 units of accommodation for graduate students on its existing site at Castle Mill which is located to the north-west of the railway station off the Roger Dudman way.“This development is significant because it demonstrates the Univer­sity’s commitment to attracting the most talented graduate students to Oxford and to relieving the burden on Oxford’s rental market by provid­ing accommodation to hundreds of additional students.“127 units were built by the Uni­versity in 2001 so this development will expand the amount of accom­modation provided on that site. The new units will be provided within 8 blocks which will be a mix of 4 and 5 storeys.”In response to allegations that de­velopment of the site began before permission was granted, the spokes­person continued, “Building on the site did not start until planning per­mission was received – there is other non-University construction work happening in the area.”last_img read more

Bullish Beaton, classy Savory help Essequibo dismantle Georgetown by 122 runs

first_imgBy Clifton RossA venomous spell of fast-bowling by Ronsford Beaton, coupled with Kemol Savory’s fifty, took defending champions Essequibo to a whopping 122-run win over Georgetown as the 2019 SBF/CGI Jaguars One- Day League bowled off yesterday at the GCC ground, Bourda.Savory led Essequibo’s charge with a stylish 81 from 112 balls that included six crisp fours and two big maximums. But it was a returning Beaton, seemingly faster and more confident, who dismantled the Georgetown side with returns of 5-18 from 6 overs of hostility.Quinton Sampson smacked 3 sixes and a four in his 28 with Beaton chipping in with a useful 26 as Essequibo posted 221-9 from their 50 overs.Youth pacer Qumar Torrington snared 3-64 with support from veteran seamer, Paul Wintz, who grabbed 2-42 as Windies U-19 spinner, Ashmead Nedd and Steven Jacobs, grabbed two scalps apiece.Georgetown, in reply, made a mess of the chase and found themselves blown away for just 99 in 26 overs. Apart from wicket-keeper Joshua Persaud (26), Jacobs (24) and skipper Leon Johnson (23), it was a woeful batting performance as the champs ran roughshod over the home team in their backyard.The spin twins, brothers Akinie and Captain Anthony Adams, spun webs around the batters as they snatched 2-28 and 2-26 respectively, duly supporting Beaton. Georgetown suffered a great setback after the former Windies speedster removed Raymond Perez (6), Robin Bacchus (0) and Winston Forrester (4).Johnson looked good during his stay before Akinie Adams had him caught by his brother to end the stay of the Georgetown skipper. Beaton had earlier removed Chris Barnwell for a duck after deliberations between the umpires while the Adams boys cleaned up the tail.Beaton then bagged his fifth victim when Jacobs edged one to the wicketkeeper Savory; bringing the home team’s innings to a screeching halt.Earlier, opener Kevon Boodie was removed for zero by Jacobs who also trapped Ricardo Adams for 1 to leave the champs in a spot of bother, batting first.Parmesh Parsotam stroked two good-looking fours in his 23 but had his stumps uprooted by a fiery delivery from the stampeding Torrington, who also removed Marvin Williams for a duck as the Champs struggled to 50-4 in the 15th over as the home team were all over their batsmen following the collapse of the top order.Savory remained firm and anchored down as he took his score to 50 with a thumping drive for four which inevitably brought up the Champs hard-earned 100 in the 28th over.Skipper Adams succumbed for 8 runs to the skills of the veteran Wintz; he was brilliantly caught by the diving Johnson in slips. Savory and Beaton steadied the ship with the former West Indies pacer showing his class with the bat as he found the ropes on a few occasions.Savory cut loose on spinner Steven Sankar, who was hammered for two fours and a six, which took the left-hander into the 70’s.Nedd got into the action at a good time, removing a dangerous looking Beaton, LBW ,to keep the hosts in the game. The Windies U-19 spinner then bagged the big wicket of Savory, who slicked one to Barnwell at backward point.Sampson walked out like a man possessed, smashing a few sixes, but Georgetown continued to take wickets and Wintz struck again as he easily took a catch off his own bowling to remove Neil Cadogan cheaply.last_img read more